Jonny Omara vs Luke Saville Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Omara 0 - 0 Saville
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jonny Omara Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Luke Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Luke Saville
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
16 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Joshua Sheehy
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Luke Saville
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Luke Saville
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
20
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Luke Saville
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Luke Saville
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Dan Martin
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | Win/Loss | 55% (369/304) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (834/723) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7568/7155) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (260/218) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (16/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 63% (70/42) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 2203 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1814 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:11:2 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 566.31 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 60% (20920/34646) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14651/20920) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6893/13723) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1255/3043) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 38% (13068/34555) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 41% (12/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (13/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 48% (163/178) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 70% (179/75) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (361/660) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (100/196) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (105/198) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (372/315) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (372/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (301/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
